[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] fix interrupt request miss problem in bsd ring for g4x

[Daniel Vetter]

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> At the moment, I'm more concerned about making sure our functions are
> consistently named and prefixed with the chipset they first work with.
>
> So we have:
>  intel_ -> general functions, used by all
>  i8xx_ -> gen2
>  i915_ -> gen3 (915/945)
>  g33_, pineview_ -> gen3 (blk/pnv) # perhaps just g33 as pnv = g33 + mobile?
>  i965_ -> gen4 (brw/crl)
>  g4x_ -> gen4 (egl/ctg)
>  ironlake_, sandybridge_, ivybridge_ -> etc
>
> So ironlake can call a g4x function, but never vice versa.

Very-Much-Wanted-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>

Can you put that somewhere prominent in the sources (a new file
naming_conventions.txt)?
Perhaps with the guidelines I've snipped away ...
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch - +41 (0) 79 364 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch