[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/43] drm/i915: drop register special-casing in forcewake
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Wed Dec 14 16:05:11 CET 2011
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:57:05 +0100, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> We currently have 3 register for which we must not grab forcewake for:
> FORCEWAKE, FROCEWAKE_MT and ECOBUS.
> - FORCEWAKE is excluded in the NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE macro and accessed
> with _NOTRACE.
> - FORCEWAKE_MT is just accessed with _NOTRACE.
> - ECOBUS is only excluded in the macro.
>
> In fear of an ever-growing list of special cases and to cut down the
> confusion, just access all of them with the _NOTRACE variants.
Instead you build in future confusion by making us guess wtf is this using
*_NOTRACE. The NOTRACE macro needs a bit of explanation as it now is
more than simply skipping the tracepoints, and why certain registers
must be accessed through the macro. Also add that warning to the
register define.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list