[Intel-gfx] [regression] drm/i915: cleanup per-pipe reg usage

[Alexey Fisher]

Am Donnerstag, den 17.02.2011, 22:24 +0100 schrieb Alexey Fisher:
> Am Donnerstag, den 17.02.2011, 13:09 -0800 schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> > On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:54:23 +0100
> > Alexey Fisher <bug-track at fisher-privat.net> wrote:
> > 
> > > Am Donnerstag, den 17.02.2011, 10:32 -0800 schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> > > > On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:26:20 +0100
> > > > Alexey Fisher <bug-track at fisher-privat.net> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 16.02.2011, 10:57 -0800 schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> > > > > > On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:02:36 +0100
> > > > > > Alexey Fisher <bug-track at fisher-privat.net> wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > In attachment are reg_dumps.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > intel_1 - is gdm login screen, every thing is ok
> > > > > > > intel_2 - is after login, noise
> > > > > > > intel_3 - is after mouse pointer was placed to the upper left corner,
> > > > > > > image is ok again.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Am Samstag, den 12.02.2011, 18:09 +0000 schrieb Chris Wilson:
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 15:16:16 +0100, Alexey Fisher
> > > > > > > > <bug-track at fisher-privat.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Video is in attachment.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > If mouse pointer is on the left top corner i get still image .. if
> > > > > > > > not -
> > > > > > > > > noise.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I think intel_reg_dumper before/after will be the best guide as to
> > > > > > > > where
> > > > > > > > the mistake crept in.
> > > > > > > > -Chris
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Also, seeing the kernel messages from a clean boot after setting
> > > > > > drm.debug=4 would help; they'll tell us what FIFO watermarks we used
> > > > > > and might help me track down the flicker.
> > > > > 
> > > > > the bad files are from version 2.6.38-rc2-00090-g9db4a9c
> > > > > the good are 2.6.38-rc2-00079-g4a1dc3f
> > > > 
> > > > Hm watermarks actually look good, but the cursor b control reg is
> > > > different for some reason.
> > > > 
> > > > Oops, I see a problem.  Does this patch help?
> > > 
> > > Yes, it is working!
> > > 
> > > Thank you.
> > 
> > Can you try the other patch I posted as well and reply with your
> > tested-by if it still works (it should!)?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> 
> I got only one patch:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_d
> index 0dc5c6f..7bab2ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -5291,7 +5291,7 @@ static void i9xx_update_cursor(struct drm_crtc
> *crtc, u32 
>         bool visible = base != 0;
>  
>         if (intel_crtc->cursor_visible != visible) {
> -               uint32_t cntl = CURCNTR(pipe);
> +               uint32_t cntl = I915_READ(CURCNTR(pipe));
>                 if (base) {
>                         cntl &= ~(CURSOR_MODE | MCURSOR_PIPE_SELECT);
>                         cntl |= CURSOR_MODE_64_ARGB_AX |
> MCURSOR_GAMMA_ENABLE;
> 
> 
> 
> 
> if you have one more, please send it again.

Och, no. Sorry, i found second patch.
Will test it now.

Regards,
        Alexey