[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915: Retire requests before disabling pagefaults
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu May 12 23:17:18 CEST 2011
As we cannot wait upon an object to be released by the GPU once we have
disabled pagefaults, process any pending retirements first in the hope
that we move any potential relocations off the active list.
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35733
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 6 ++++++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 20a4cc5..3c639ba 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -446,6 +446,12 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_relocate(struct drm_device *dev,
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
int ret = 0;
+ /* Try to move as many of the relocation targets off the active list
+ * to avoid unnecessary fallbacks to the slow path, as we cannot wait
+ * for the retirement with pagefaults disabled.
+ */
+ i915_gem_retire_requests(dev);
+
/* This is the fast path and we cannot handle a pagefault whilst
* holding the struct mutex lest the user pass in the relocations
* contained within a mmaped bo. For in such a case we, the page
--
1.7.5.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list