[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] DRM planes

[Jesse Barnes]

On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 18:29:14 +0100
Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I've discussed this a bit on irc and consensus seems to be "some ugliness
> due to interface impendance mistmatches in the kernel? who cares ...". I
> agree that there's not a fundamental problem with fourcc and planar yuv
> that can't be fixed with a bunch of boilerplate code with the assorted set
> of inconsistencies between drivers. So if this is the general consensus
> I'll just look the other way, shut down my shields an recall my battle
> ship out of LEO ... ;-)

Rob, Joonyoung, Inkie, any comment on using fourcc vs rolling our own
surface definitions?

Thanks,
-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20111103/4b4ae914/attachment.sig>