[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: relative_constants_mode race fix

[Ben Widawsky]

After my refactoring, Chris noticed that we had a bug.

dev_priv keeps track of the current addressing mode that gets set at
execbuffer time. Unfortunately the existing code was doing this before
acquiring struct_mutex which leaves a race with another thread also
doing an execbuffer. If that wasn't bad enough, relocate_slow drops
struct_mutex which opens a much more likely error where another thread
comes in and modifies the state while relocate_slow is being slow.

The solution here is to just defer setting this state until we
absolutely need it, and we know we'll have struct_mutex for the
remainder of our code path.

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c |   67 ++++++++++++++--------------
 1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 3693e83..0b343af 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -1003,39 +1003,6 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	mode = args->flags & I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_MASK;
-	switch (mode) {
-	case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_GENERAL:
-	case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_ABSOLUTE:
-	case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_SURFACE:
-		if (ring == &dev_priv->ring[RCS] &&
-		    mode != dev_priv->relative_constants_mode) {
-			if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 4)
-				return -EINVAL;
-
-			if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen > 5 &&
-			    mode == I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_SURFACE)
-				return -EINVAL;
-
-			ret = intel_ring_begin(ring, 4);
-			if (ret)
-				return ret;
-
-			intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_NOOP);
-			intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1));
-			intel_ring_emit(ring, INSTPM);
-			intel_ring_emit(ring,
-					I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_MASK << 16 | mode);
-			intel_ring_advance(ring);
-
-			dev_priv->relative_constants_mode = mode;
-		}
-		break;
-	default:
-		DRM_ERROR("execbuf with unknown constants: %d\n", mode);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	if (args->buffer_count < 1) {
 		DRM_ERROR("execbuf with %d buffers\n", args->buffer_count);
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -1132,6 +1099,40 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 			goto err;
 	}
 
+	mode = args->flags & I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_MASK;
+	switch (mode) {
+	case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_GENERAL:
+	case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_ABSOLUTE:
+	case I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_SURFACE:
+		if (ring == &dev_priv->ring[RCS] &&
+		    mode != dev_priv->relative_constants_mode) {
+			if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 4)
+				return -EINVAL;
+
+			if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen > 5 &&
+			    mode == I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_REL_SURFACE)
+				return -EINVAL;
+
+			ret = intel_ring_begin(ring, 4);
+			if (ret)
+				goto err;
+
+			intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_NOOP);
+			intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1));
+			intel_ring_emit(ring, INSTPM);
+			intel_ring_emit(ring,
+					I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_MASK << 16 | mode);
+			intel_ring_advance(ring);
+
+			dev_priv->relative_constants_mode = mode;
+		}
+		break;
+	default:
+		DRM_ERROR("execbuf with unknown constants: %d\n", mode);
+		ret -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
 	/* Set the pending read domains for the batch buffer to COMMAND */
 	if (batch_obj->base.pending_write_domain) {
 		DRM_ERROR("Attempting to use self-modifying batch buffer\n");
-- 
1.7.7