[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Rename PIPE_CONTROL bit defines to be less terse.

[Ben Widawsky]

On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 16:01:17 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 04:51:16PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > I thought we all agreed that "PIPE_CONTROL_WRITE_FLUSH" doesn't make
> > sense for Gen6? Or was that just me agreeing with myself?
> 
> I couldn't find any comment of yours to that effect ... :p You'd be much
> happier if I add a RENDER_CACHE_FLUSH for gen6+?
> 
> Cheers, Daniel

I really want to make these things match the docs as closely as
possible. Especially PIPE_CONTROL which I know I will refer to over and
over. Like I said, r-b from me either way, but if you redo the series
anyway for some reason, I would prefer that.

Ben