[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: IS_GEN6 && IS_GEN7 - is unpossible

Jesse Barnes jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org
Mon Apr 9 18:55:56 CEST 2012


On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 18:02:11 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 01:58:11PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 13:48:30 -0700
> > Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> wrote:
> > > 
> > > >Imagine my surprise when tracking something down, I bisected to a VLV
> > > >commit.
> > > >
> > > >CC: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
> > > >Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky at intel.com>
> > > >---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |    2 +-
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > >b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > >index 3abebb5..2ce1763 100644
> > > >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > >@@ -9537,7 +9537,7 @@ void intel_modeset_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > > 		intel_init_emon(dev);
> > > > 	}
> > > > 
> > > >-	if ((IS_GEN6(dev) && IS_GEN7(dev)) && !IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) {
> > > >+	if ((IS_GEN6(dev) || IS_GEN7(dev)) && !IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) {
> > > > 		gen6_enable_rps(dev_priv);
> > > > 		gen6_update_ring_freq(dev_priv);
> > > > 	}
> > > >-- 
> > > >1.7.10
> > > 
> > > Daniel caught that one too, maybe he hasn't pushed the fix? 
> > 
> > Seems it hasn't been pushed, and I missed the exchange about the issue.
> > As long as it's known already...`
> 
> Oh dear, how totally do I suck. And with rc6 disabled by accident on
> snb&ivb the QA testing cycle is rather pointless, too.
> 
> I'll rip out the broken patch, rebase -testing and -next and ask QA to
> re-run any gpu tests. I think modesetting tests shouldn't be affected by
> rc6.
> 
> Ben, thanks for catching this screw-up.

It's my fault, sorry for posting it in the first place!

Daniel, do you need an incremental one to add the VLV check to this
location or do you just want to fix it in-place after reverting the
breakage?  Also is the resume path correct (maybe that's the one you
caught?)?

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20120409/cd74acea/attachment.sig>


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list