[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915: split up ring->dispatch_execbuffer functions
Daniel Vetter
daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch
Wed Apr 11 22:12:56 CEST 2012
Now that we can, we should split them up in a way that makes some
sense and banishes the IS_ checks into init code.
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index 2cb1c8f..3d32c51 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -808,7 +808,7 @@ gen6_ring_put_irq(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
}
static int
-ring_dispatch_execbuffer(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, u32 offset, u32 length)
+i965_dispatch_execbuffer(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, u32 offset, u32 length)
{
int ret;
@@ -826,37 +826,36 @@ ring_dispatch_execbuffer(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, u32 offset, u32 length)
}
static int
-render_ring_dispatch_execbuffer(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
+i830_dispatch_execbuffer(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
u32 offset, u32 len)
{
- struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev;
int ret;
- if (IS_I830(dev) || IS_845G(dev)) {
- ret = intel_ring_begin(ring, 4);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ ret = intel_ring_begin(ring, 4);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
- intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_BATCH_BUFFER);
- intel_ring_emit(ring, offset | MI_BATCH_NON_SECURE);
- intel_ring_emit(ring, offset + len - 8);
- intel_ring_emit(ring, 0);
- } else {
- ret = intel_ring_begin(ring, 2);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_BATCH_BUFFER);
+ intel_ring_emit(ring, offset | MI_BATCH_NON_SECURE);
+ intel_ring_emit(ring, offset + len - 8);
+ intel_ring_emit(ring, 0);
+ intel_ring_advance(ring);
- if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 4) {
- intel_ring_emit(ring,
- MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START | (2 << 6) |
- MI_BATCH_NON_SECURE_I965);
- intel_ring_emit(ring, offset);
- } else {
- intel_ring_emit(ring,
- MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START | (2 << 6));
- intel_ring_emit(ring, offset | MI_BATCH_NON_SECURE);
- }
- }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+i915_dispatch_execbuffer(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
+ u32 offset, u32 len)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = intel_ring_begin(ring, 2);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START | (2 << 6));
+ intel_ring_emit(ring, offset | MI_BATCH_NON_SECURE);
intel_ring_advance(ring);
return 0;
@@ -1326,7 +1325,14 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
ring->irq_enable_mask = I915_USER_INTERRUPT;
}
ring->write_tail = ring_write_tail;
- ring->dispatch_execbuffer = render_ring_dispatch_execbuffer;
+ if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6)
+ ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer;
+ else if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 4)
+ ring->dispatch_execbuffer = i965_dispatch_execbuffer;
+ else if (IS_I830(dev) || IS_845G(dev))
+ ring->dispatch_execbuffer = i830_dispatch_execbuffer;
+ else
+ ring->dispatch_execbuffer = i915_dispatch_execbuffer;
ring->init = init_render_ring;
ring->cleanup = render_ring_cleanup;
@@ -1367,7 +1373,12 @@ int intel_render_ring_init_dri(struct drm_device *dev, u64 start, u32 size)
ring->irq_enable_mask = I915_USER_INTERRUPT;
}
ring->write_tail = ring_write_tail;
- ring->dispatch_execbuffer = render_ring_dispatch_execbuffer;
+ if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 4)
+ ring->dispatch_execbuffer = i965_dispatch_execbuffer;
+ else if (IS_I830(dev) || IS_845G(dev))
+ ring->dispatch_execbuffer = i830_dispatch_execbuffer;
+ else
+ ring->dispatch_execbuffer = i915_dispatch_execbuffer;
ring->init = init_render_ring;
ring->cleanup = render_ring_cleanup;
@@ -1442,7 +1453,7 @@ int intel_init_bsd_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
ring->irq_get = i9xx_ring_get_irq;
ring->irq_put = i9xx_ring_put_irq;
}
- ring->dispatch_execbuffer = ring_dispatch_execbuffer;
+ ring->dispatch_execbuffer = i965_dispatch_execbuffer;
}
ring->init = init_ring_common;
--
1.7.7.5
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list