[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Clarify the semantics of tiling-changed by renaming it
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Sat Apr 21 17:23:23 CEST 2012
Rename obj->tiling_changed to obj->fence_dirty so that it is clear that
it flags when the parameters for an active fence (including the
no-fence) register are changed.
v2: Use fence_dirty to better express what the flag tracks and add a few
more details to the comments to serve as a reminder of how the GPU also
uses the unfenced register slot.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 9 ++++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 8 ++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c | 10 +++++++++-
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index fec57a7..0feffce 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -883,7 +883,14 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object {
* Current tiling mode for the object.
*/
unsigned int tiling_mode:2;
- unsigned int tiling_changed:1;
+ /**
+ * Whether the tiling parameters for the currently associated fence
+ * register have changed. Note that for the purposes of tracking
+ * tiling changes we also treat the unfenced register, the register
+ * slot that the object occupies whilst it executes a fenced
+ * command (such as BLT on gen2/3), as a "fence".
+ */
+ unsigned int fence_dirty:1;
/** How many users have pinned this object in GTT space. The following
* users can each hold at most one reference: pwrite/pread, pin_ioctl
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 7bc4a40..5bf8829 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static inline void i915_gem_object_fence_lost(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
/* As we do not have an associated fence register, we will force
* a tiling change if we ever need to acquire one.
*/
- obj->tiling_changed = false;
+ obj->fence_dirty = false;
obj->fence_reg = I915_FENCE_REG_NONE;
}
@@ -2456,7 +2456,7 @@ i915_gem_object_get_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
/* Have we updated the tiling parameters upon the object and so
* will need to serialise the write to the associated fence register?
*/
- if (obj->tiling_changed) {
+ if (obj->fence_dirty) {
ret = i915_gem_object_flush_fence(obj);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -2465,7 +2465,7 @@ i915_gem_object_get_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
/* Just update our place in the LRU if our fence is getting reused. */
if (obj->fence_reg != I915_FENCE_REG_NONE) {
reg = &dev_priv->fence_regs[obj->fence_reg];
- if (!obj->tiling_changed) {
+ if (!obj->fence_dirty) {
list_move_tail(®->lru_list,
&dev_priv->mm.fence_list);
return 0;
@@ -2488,7 +2488,7 @@ i915_gem_object_get_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
return 0;
i915_gem_object_update_fence(obj, reg, enable);
- obj->tiling_changed = false;
+ obj->fence_dirty = false;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c
index 1a93066..c9786cd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c
@@ -355,6 +355,11 @@ i915_gem_set_tiling(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
* no longer meets the alignment restrictions for its new
* tiling mode. Otherwise we can just leave it alone, but
* need to ensure that any fence register is cleared.
+ *
+ * After updating the tiling parameters, we then flag whether
+ * we need to update an associated fence register. Note this
+ * has to also include the unfenced register the GPU uses
+ * whilst executing a fenced command for an untiled object.
*/
i915_gem_release_mmap(obj);
@@ -374,7 +379,10 @@ i915_gem_set_tiling(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
}
if (ret == 0) {
- obj->tiling_changed = true;
+ obj->fence_dirty =
+ obj->fenced_gpu_access ||
+ obj->fence_reg != I915_FENCE_REG_NONE;
+
obj->tiling_mode = args->tiling_mode;
obj->stride = args->stride;
}
--
1.7.10
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list