[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915: Inline I915_INTERRUPT_ENABLE_FIX

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Wed Apr 25 23:28:21 CEST 2012


On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:55:12 -0700, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:59:51 +0100
> Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > +	dev_priv->irq_mask = ~(I915_ASLE_INTERRUPT |
> > +			       I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_A_EVENT_INTERRUPT |
> > +			       I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_B_EVENT_INTERRUPT |
> > +			       I915_DISPLAY_PLANE_A_FLIP_PENDING_INTERRUPT |
> > +			       I915_DISPLAY_PLANE_B_FLIP_PENDING_INTERRUPT |
> > +			       I915_RENDER_COMMAND_PARSER_ERROR_INTERRUPT);
> > +
> > +	enable_mask = (I915_ASLE_INTERRUPT |
> > +		       I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_A_EVENT_INTERRUPT |
> > +		       I915_DISPLAY_PIPE_B_EVENT_INTERRUPT |
> > +		       I915_DISPLAY_PLANE_A_FLIP_PENDING_INTERRUPT |
> > +		       I915_DISPLAY_PLANE_B_FLIP_PENDING_INTERRUPT |
> > +		       I915_RENDER_COMMAND_PARSER_ERROR_INTERRUPT |
> > +		       I915_USER_INTERRUPT);
> 
> You could set the enable mask to ~irq_mask | I915_USER_INTERRUPT I
> think just to save a little duplication?  No biggie though.

I considered reducing the duplication, but having just done i8xx/i915
where the relationship between irq_mask and enable_mask was a little
more complicated, I erred on the side of verbosity.

enable_mask = ~dev_priv->irq_mask;
enable_mask |= I915_USER_INTERRUPT;
if (IS_G4X(dev))
  enable_mask |= I915_BSD_USER_INTERRUPT;

Works for me as well.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list