[Intel-gfx] v3.6 haswell regression from v3.5?

Ben Guthro ben at guthro.net
Sat Aug 11 04:21:32 CEST 2012


I'll try to do this early next week, and report back.


On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> wrote:
> On 2012-08-10 09:25, Ben Guthro wrote:
>>
>> Hello, I've been attempting to get a Shark Bay / Haswell platform up &
>> running, and have been having some difficulties that I'm hoping you
>> all can possibly help with.
>>
>> I first tried the 3.5 kernel, and had some success after applying the
>> following patch:
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1229541/
>>
>> This seemed to be necessary to get the  0x0c26 PCI id to be loaded by
>> i915, and use KMS.
>>
>> After doing this, I had some success, but things still would become
>> unstable, and flash test patterns on the screen about every third
>> boot.
>>
>>
>> I figured that I would move on to the tip, and see if that fixed anything.
>>
>> However, at the tip, I cannot get i915 to display graphics at all -
>> even with applying the patch above.
>>
>>
>> I understand that this is still under development - but this seems
>> like a regression from 3.5
>> Is there a codebase that I should be using for this testing?
>>
>
> Yes it is the codebase you should use. It sounds like a regression, can you
> bisect it?
>
>
>>
>> Ben
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
>
> --
> Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list