[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Track unbound pages
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon Aug 20 11:36:09 CEST 2012
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:00:39 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> int
> -i915_gem_object_get_pages_gtt(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> - gfp_t gfpmask)
> +i915_gem_object_get_pages_gtt(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = obj->base.dev->dev_private;
> int page_count, i;
> struct address_space *mapping;
> - struct inode *inode;
> struct page *page;
> + gfp_t gfp;
>
> if (obj->pages || obj->sg_table)
> return 0;
>
> + /* Assert that the object is not currently in any GPU domain. As it
> + * wasn't in the GTT, there shouldn't be any way it could have been in
> + * a GPU cache
> + */
> + BUG_ON(obj->base.read_domains & I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS);
> + BUG_ON(obj->base.write_domain & I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS);
> +
> /* Get the list of pages out of our struct file. They'll be pinned
> * at this point until we release them.
> */
> page_count = obj->base.size / PAGE_SIZE;
> - BUG_ON(obj->pages != NULL);
> - obj->pages = drm_malloc_ab(page_count, sizeof(struct page *));
> + obj->pages = kmalloc(page_count*sizeof(struct page *), GFP_KERNEL);
This is a silly one (by me). At one point the patch introduced
i915_malloc() and replaced drm_malloc_ab() with it and then I reverted
that after transitioning to using the sg_table everywhere.
It needs to still be drm_malloc_ab() in this and the follow-on patches
until it is replaced by sg_alloc_table().
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list