[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Reduce memory pressure during shrinker by preallocating swizzle pages

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon Dec 3 22:03:14 CET 2012


On a machine with bit17 swizzling, we need to store the bit17 of the
physical page address in put-pages. This requires a memory allocation,
on average less than a page, which may be difficult to satisfy is the
request to put-pages is on behalf of the shrinker. We could allow that
allocation to pull from the reserved memory pools, but it seems much
safer to preallocate the array for tiled objects on affected machines.

v2: Export i915_gem_object_needs_bit17_swizzle() for reuse.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h        |   10 ++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c        |    8 --------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c |   12 ++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index d4a3595..656775c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@
 #ifndef _I915_DRV_H_
 #define _I915_DRV_H_
 
+#include <uapi/drm/i915_drm.h>
+
 #include "i915_reg.h"
 #include "intel_bios.h"
 #include "intel_ringbuffer.h"
@@ -1648,6 +1650,14 @@ i915_gem_object_create_stolen_for_preallocated(struct drm_device *dev,
 void i915_gem_object_release_stolen(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
 
 /* i915_gem_tiling.c */
+inline static bool i915_gem_object_needs_bit17_swizzle(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
+{
+	drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = obj->base.dev->dev_private;
+
+	return dev_priv->mm.bit_6_swizzle_x == I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_9_10_17 &&
+		obj->tiling_mode != I915_TILING_NONE;
+}
+
 void i915_gem_detect_bit_6_swizzle(struct drm_device *dev);
 void i915_gem_object_do_bit_17_swizzle(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
 void i915_gem_object_save_bit_17_swizzle(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index b00e55f..569d40e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -261,14 +261,6 @@ i915_gem_create_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 			       args->size, &args->handle);
 }
 
-static int i915_gem_object_needs_bit17_swizzle(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
-{
-	drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = obj->base.dev->dev_private;
-
-	return dev_priv->mm.bit_6_swizzle_x == I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_9_10_17 &&
-		obj->tiling_mode != I915_TILING_NONE;
-}
-
 static inline int
 __copy_to_user_swizzled(char __user *cpu_vaddr,
 			const char *gpu_vaddr, int gpu_offset,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c
index 8e59bb5..78a7565 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c
@@ -351,6 +351,18 @@ i915_gem_set_tiling(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 	/* we have to maintain this existing ABI... */
 	args->stride = obj->stride;
 	args->tiling_mode = obj->tiling_mode;
+
+	/* Try to preallocate memory required to save swizzling on put-pages */
+	if (i915_gem_object_needs_bit17_swizzle(obj)) {
+		if (obj->bit_17 == NULL) {
+			obj->bit_17 = kmalloc(BITS_TO_LONGS(obj->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT) *
+					      sizeof(long), GFP_KERNEL);
+		}
+	} else {
+		kfree(obj->bit_17);
+		obj->bit_17 = NULL;
+	}
+
 	drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base);
 	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 
-- 
1.7.10.4




More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list