[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: check gtfifodbg after possibly failed writes

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Wed Feb 8 11:28:26 CET 2012

On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 11:15:58 +0100, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> Bit a bikeshed comment, but I prefer explicit control flow instead of
> playing tricks with the short-circuiting behaviour of &&. Mind if you can
> change that, too?

Whilst we're on the subject of bikesheds, having an explicit tracepoint
for forcewake get/put would have answered a query I just had.

Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre

More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list