[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Android port of intel-gpu-tools
Kavuri, Sateesh
sateesh.kavuri at intel.com
Tue Jan 10 17:50:49 CET 2012
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Jackson [mailto:ajax at redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 8:34 PM
> To: Kavuri, Sateesh
> Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Android port of intel-gpu-tools
>
> On 1/9/12 11:45 PM, Sateesh Kavuri wrote:
> > Added support for Android. Changes include fixes for compilation issues
> > related to Android using an older version of GCC compiler (ver 4.3.3)
> > while the latest version of intel-gpu-tools confirms to GCC ver 4.5.2
> > (C99 standard functions), using functions like getline(). Fixed such
> > functions, header dependencies for android and added an Android.mk file.
>
> I can understand avoiding C99 functions that android doesn't have, but this kind
> of thing:
>
> > + #ifdef ANDROID
> > + int i;
> > + for (i = 1; i< len; i++) {
> > + #else
> > for (int i = 1; i< len; i++) {
> > + #endif
>
> is silly. Does gcc -std=c99 on android seriously not cope with this?
Yes, -std=c99 would help to get rid of such silly checks (would fix it). Continued
this, since there has to be a ANDROID definition for checks like fcntl.h header path
>
> - ajax
--
Sateesh
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list