[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: argument for deferring retirement

[Eugeni Dodonov]

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 20:42, Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> wrote:

> Sometimes it may be the case when we idle the gpu or wait on something
> we don't actually want to process the retiring list. This patch allows
> callers to choose the behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net>
>

Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov at intel.com>

(I agree with Keith comments though - defer retirement could be renamed to
do_retire or force_retire or similar..).

-- 
Eugeni Dodonov
<http://eugeni.dodonov.net/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20120124/bc47278e/attachment.html>