[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: add cpu_map to i915 object

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Fri Jul 13 16:03:40 CEST 2012


On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 06:56:44 -0700, Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:47:15 +0100
> Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 23:16:13 -0700, Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> wrote:
> > > mostly for convenience, this will help us clear up a bit of the code in
> > > intel_ringbuffer.c
> > 
> > I don't think your couple of use-cases is a strong enough argument to
> > justify an extra pointer on thousands of objects.
> > 
> > If you wanted, you could make the ilk pc w/a use the status page
> > instead...
> > -Chris
> > 
> 
> Actually, my original code went a step further than this. It combined
> all the ring data into 1 object, and then used a mini allocator for the
> pipe control, ring status, and the few dwords I need. I was _sure_ you
> would hate that, so I went to this.
> 
> Can you swallow the one object for everything + allocator idea?

Yes. I'll happily pay a little one-off extra complexity to reduce the
number of pages we have allocated for a smattering of dwords.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list