[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915: Remove explicit flush from i915_gem_object_flush_fence()
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Fri Jul 20 13:41:04 CEST 2012
As the flush is either performed explictly immediately after the
execbuffer dispatch, or before the serialisation of last_fenced_seqno we
can forgo the explict i915_gem_flush_ring().
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 16 ++--------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 9c3db94..f5e6a3b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2473,21 +2473,8 @@ static void i915_gem_object_update_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
static int
i915_gem_object_flush_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
{
- int ret;
-
- if (obj->fenced_gpu_access) {
- if (obj->base.write_domain & I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS) {
- ret = i915_gem_flush_ring(obj->ring,
- 0, obj->base.write_domain);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- }
-
- obj->fenced_gpu_access = false;
- }
-
if (obj->last_fenced_seqno) {
- ret = i915_wait_seqno(obj->ring, obj->last_fenced_seqno);
+ int ret = i915_wait_seqno(obj->ring, obj->last_fenced_seqno);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -2500,6 +2487,7 @@ i915_gem_object_flush_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
if (obj->base.read_domains & I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT)
mb();
+ obj->fenced_gpu_access = false;
return 0;
}
--
1.7.10.4
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list