[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: extract object active state flushing code

[Daniel Vetter]

On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 03:21:23PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Both busy_ioctl and the new wait_ioct need to do the same dance (or at
> least should). Some slight changes:
> - busy_ioctl now unconditionally checks for olr. Before emitting a
>   require flush would have prevent the olr check and hence required a
>   second call to the busy ioctl to really emit the request.
> - the timeout wait now also retires request. Not really required for
>   abi-reasons, but makes a notch more sense imo.
> 
> I've tested this by pimping the i-g-t test some more and also checking
> the polling behviour of the wait_rendering_timeout ioctl versus what
> busy_ioctl returns.
> 
> v2: Too many people complained about unplug, new color is
> flush_active.
> 
> v3: Kill the comment about the unplug moniker.
> 
> v4: s/un-active/inactive/
> 
> Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
Picked up for dinq with Ben's irc r-b added.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel at ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48