[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] kill /dev/agpgart, v2
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon Jun 25 13:22:55 CEST 2012
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 19:53:33 -0300, Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 06/24/2012 03:51 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Well, only for gen6+, and now with Dave's suggestion implemented to tell drm
> > core that we don't need agp. It's ugly and I really prefer if we'd kill the drm
> > agp midlayer stuff instead. But this way we can go forward with moving gen6+ gtt
> > stuff to drm/i915 and implementing some neat new cool things.
> >
> > As usual, flames&bikesheds highly welcome.
>
> I cannot think on a less invasive way to do so, so, for the series:
> Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov at intel.com>
>
> With just one tiny bikeshed on patch2.
Agreed, except that it is not just bikeshedding on patch too. Without
any hint as to why gen3 is special, both in the changelog and justifying
the code as a comment (remember the comments are to explain why!), the
patch is NAKed.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list