[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: don't return a spurious -EIO from intel_ring_begin

[Chris Wilson]

On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:49:03 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 09:32:23PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > It looks like the patch to reuse check_wedge() should be first as it is
> > the common theme in the series.
> 
> Hm, actually I think I'll smash the check_wedge into the last patch. With
> that change, this patch would solely be about not returning spurious -EIO,
> whereas the last patch would be solely about not returning -EAGAIN in
> cases we can't handle. Does that make some sense?

The split sounds reasonable, grouping the patch in that manner should
give a better story. My only holdout is that I don't want to lose the
papering in i915_reset().
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre