[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix PCH PLL assertions to not assume CRTC:PLL relationship

[Daniel Vetter]

On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 06:10:50PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> The existing assertions were written under the assumption that we wanted
> to test the related PLL to a CRTC. With the split of PLL into a
> separately managed entity which may be shared amongst CRTCs, we need to
> pass in both the CRTC and the PLL to the assertion routine.
> Occassionally, this means passing NULL for the CRTC as we wish to check
> the status of the PLL irrespective of the current CRTC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
Picked up for -fixes, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel at ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48