[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: add min freq control to debugfs
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu May 24 21:51:40 CEST 2012
On Thu, 24 May 2012 09:22:23 -0700, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> This makes for easier benchmarking and testing. One can set a fixed
> frequency by setting min and max to the same value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index eb2b3c2..c0b7688 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -1765,6 +1765,68 @@ static const struct file_operations i915_max_freq_fops = {
> };
>
> static ssize_t
> +i915_min_freq_read(struct file *filp,
> + char __user *ubuf,
> + size_t max,
> + loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *dev = filp->private_data;
> + drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + char buf[80];
> + int len;
> +
> + len = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> + "min freq: %d\n", dev_priv->min_delay * 50);
> +
> + if (len > sizeof(buf))
> + len = sizeof(buf);
> +
> + return simple_read_from_buffer(ubuf, max, ppos, buf, len);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t
> +i915_min_freq_write(struct file *filp,
> + const char __user *ubuf,
> + size_t cnt,
> + loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *dev = filp->private_data;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + char buf[20];
> + int val = 1;
> +
> + if (cnt > 0) {
> + if (cnt > sizeof(buf) - 1)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(buf, ubuf, cnt))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + buf[cnt] = 0;
> +
> + val = simple_strtoul(buf, NULL, 0);
> + }
> +
> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Manually setting min freq to %d\n", val);
> +
> + /*
> + * Turbo will still be enabled, but won't go above the set value.
> + */
> + dev_priv->min_delay = val / 50;
Do we need some sanity checking here to prevent the user from being
silly?
Looks good otherwise,
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list