[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] [RESEND] drm/i915: s/i915_wait_request/i915_wait_seqno/g

[Daniel Vetter]

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 03:03:11PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> Wait request is poorly named IMO. After working with these functions for
> some time, I feel it's much clearer to name the functions more
> appropriately.
> 
> Of course we must update the callers to use the new name as well.
> 
> This leaves room within our namespace for a *real* wait request function
> at some point.
> 
> Note to maintainer: this patch is optional.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net>
> Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov at intel.com>
I've slurped in the entire series for -next, thanks for the patches. I'll
look at the testcase some more over the w/e (I'll be a bit offline), I
think we should pimp it with a few more cases.

Cheers, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel at ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48