[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915: extract common link_m_n helpers
Paulo Zanoni
przanoni at gmail.com
Tue Nov 20 12:24:34 CET 2012
Hi
2012/11/5 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>:
> Both the dp and fdi code use the exact same computations (ignore minor
> differences in conversion between bits and bytes).
>
> This makes it even more apparent that we have a _massive_ mess between
> cpu transcoder/fdi link/pch transcoder and pch link settings. And also
> that we have hilarious amounts of confusion between edp and dp
> (despite that they're identical at a link level).
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
This is certainly a first improvement to the m_n code and doing the
exact same thing as you did was even on my TODO list. I think there's
a lot more to do, but this patch is certainly the first step. There is
just one minor bikeshed below:
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 13 ++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 31 +++++++++-------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 39 +++---------------------------------
> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index c4339c2..23cea8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,19 @@ struct intel_pch_pll {
> };
> #define I915_NUM_PLLS 2
>
> +/* Used by dp and fdi links */
> +struct intel_link_m_n {
> + uint32_t tu;
> + uint32_t gmch_m;
> + uint32_t gmch_n;
> + uint32_t link_m;
> + uint32_t link_n;
> +};
> +
> +void intel_link_compute_m_n(int bpp, int nlanes,
> + int pixel_clock, int link_clock,
> + struct intel_link_m_n *m_n);
> +
> struct intel_ddi_plls {
> int spll_refcount;
> int wrpll1_refcount;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 0c923a6..5432e9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -3956,16 +3956,8 @@ static int i830_get_display_clock_speed(struct drm_device *dev)
> return 133000;
> }
>
> -struct fdi_m_n {
> - u32 tu;
> - u32 gmch_m;
> - u32 gmch_n;
> - u32 link_m;
> - u32 link_n;
> -};
> -
> static void
> -fdi_reduce_ratio(u32 *num, u32 *den)
> +intel_reduce_ratio(uint32_t *num, uint32_t *den)
> {
> while (*num > 0xffffff || *den > 0xffffff) {
> *num >>= 1;
> @@ -3973,20 +3965,18 @@ fdi_reduce_ratio(u32 *num, u32 *den)
> }
> }
>
> -static void
> -ironlake_compute_m_n(int bits_per_pixel, int nlanes, int pixel_clock,
> - int link_clock, struct fdi_m_n *m_n)
> +void
> +intel_link_compute_m_n(int bits_per_pixel, int nlanes,
> + int pixel_clock, int link_clock,
> + struct intel_link_m_n *m_n)
> {
> - m_n->tu = 64; /* default size */
> -
> - /* BUG_ON(pixel_clock > INT_MAX / 36); */
> + m_n->tu = 64;
> m_n->gmch_m = bits_per_pixel * pixel_clock;
> m_n->gmch_n = link_clock * nlanes * 8;
I think here we should keep the gmch_m and gmch_n calculations used in
the DP code instead of this one, since it matches the spec a little
better... The spec says that gmch_m should be "dot clock * bytes per
pixel" and gmch_n should be "ls_clk * number of lanes". So the lines
that are currently inside intel_dp_compute_m_n look better:
m_n->gmch_m = (pixel_clock * bpp) >> 3;
m_n->gmch_n = link_clock * nlanes;
(Also, in this case we'll need even higher numbers before we overflow)
I applied a version with the DP values locally and tested. So my
version of this patch is Reviewed-by and Tested-by me.
> - fdi_reduce_ratio(&m_n->gmch_m, &m_n->gmch_n);
> -
> + intel_reduce_ratio(&m_n->gmch_m, &m_n->gmch_n);
> m_n->link_m = pixel_clock;
> m_n->link_n = link_clock;
> - fdi_reduce_ratio(&m_n->link_m, &m_n->link_n);
> + intel_reduce_ratio(&m_n->link_m, &m_n->link_n);
> }
>
> static inline bool intel_panel_use_ssc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> @@ -5100,7 +5090,7 @@ static void ironlake_set_m_n(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_crtc->cpu_transcoder;
> struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder, *edp_encoder = NULL;
> - struct fdi_m_n m_n = {0};
> + struct intel_link_m_n m_n = {0};
> int target_clock, pixel_multiplier, lane, link_bw;
> bool is_dp = false, is_cpu_edp = false;
>
> @@ -5158,8 +5148,7 @@ static void ironlake_set_m_n(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>
> if (pixel_multiplier > 1)
> link_bw *= pixel_multiplier;
> - ironlake_compute_m_n(intel_crtc->bpp, lane, target_clock, link_bw,
> - &m_n);
> + intel_link_compute_m_n(intel_crtc->bpp, lane, target_clock, link_bw, &m_n);
>
> I915_WRITE(PIPE_DATA_M1(cpu_transcoder), TU_SIZE(m_n.tu) | m_n.gmch_m);
> I915_WRITE(PIPE_DATA_N1(cpu_transcoder), m_n.gmch_n);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 8ec4d1c..5d8ae65 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -742,39 +742,6 @@ intel_dp_mode_fixup(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> return false;
> }
>
> -struct intel_dp_m_n {
> - uint32_t tu;
> - uint32_t gmch_m;
> - uint32_t gmch_n;
> - uint32_t link_m;
> - uint32_t link_n;
> -};
> -
> -static void
> -intel_reduce_ratio(uint32_t *num, uint32_t *den)
> -{
> - while (*num > 0xffffff || *den > 0xffffff) {
> - *num >>= 1;
> - *den >>= 1;
> - }
> -}
> -
> -static void
> -intel_dp_compute_m_n(int bpp,
> - int nlanes,
> - int pixel_clock,
> - int link_clock,
> - struct intel_dp_m_n *m_n)
> -{
> - m_n->tu = 64;
> - m_n->gmch_m = (pixel_clock * bpp) >> 3;
> - m_n->gmch_n = link_clock * nlanes;
> - intel_reduce_ratio(&m_n->gmch_m, &m_n->gmch_n);
> - m_n->link_m = pixel_clock;
> - m_n->link_n = link_clock;
> - intel_reduce_ratio(&m_n->link_m, &m_n->link_n);
> -}
> -
> void
> intel_dp_set_m_n(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
> @@ -785,7 +752,7 @@ intel_dp_set_m_n(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> int lane_count = 4;
> - struct intel_dp_m_n m_n;
> + struct intel_link_m_n m_n;
> int pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
> enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_crtc->cpu_transcoder;
>
> @@ -808,8 +775,8 @@ intel_dp_set_m_n(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> * the number of bytes_per_pixel post-LUT, which we always
> * set up for 8-bits of R/G/B, or 3 bytes total.
> */
> - intel_dp_compute_m_n(intel_crtc->bpp, lane_count,
> - mode->clock, adjusted_mode->clock, &m_n);
> + intel_link_compute_m_n(intel_crtc->bpp, lane_count,
> + mode->clock, adjusted_mode->clock, &m_n);
>
> if (IS_HASWELL(dev)) {
> I915_WRITE(PIPE_DATA_M1(cpu_transcoder),
> --
> 1.7.11.7
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Paulo Zanoni
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list