[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: don't frob the vblank ts in finish_page_flip
Imre Deak
imre.deak at intel.com
Wed Oct 3 10:09:23 CEST 2012
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 20:10 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Now that we correctly generate it, this hack is no longer required (and
> might actually paper over a serious bug).
>
> pageflip timestamps are sanity check in the latest version of the flip-test
> in intel-gpu-tools.
>
> v2: Also remove the gettimeofday(&now) which is no longer used.
> Noticed by Mario Kleiner.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
Tested-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 23 +----------------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 57c1309..67912fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -6181,15 +6181,13 @@ static void do_intel_finish_page_flip(struct drm_device *dev,
> struct intel_unpin_work *work;
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> struct drm_pending_vblank_event *e;
> - struct timeval tnow, tvbl;
> + struct timeval tvbl;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> /* Ignore early vblank irqs */
> if (intel_crtc == NULL)
> return;
>
> - do_gettimeofday(&tnow);
> -
> spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock, flags);
> work = intel_crtc->unpin_work;
> if (work == NULL || !work->pending) {
> @@ -6203,25 +6201,6 @@ static void do_intel_finish_page_flip(struct drm_device *dev,
> e = work->event;
> e->event.sequence = drm_vblank_count_and_time(dev, intel_crtc->pipe, &tvbl);
>
> - /* Called before vblank count and timestamps have
> - * been updated for the vblank interval of flip
> - * completion? Need to increment vblank count and
> - * add one videorefresh duration to returned timestamp
> - * to account for this. We assume this happened if we
> - * get called over 0.9 frame durations after the last
> - * timestamped vblank.
> - *
> - * This calculation can not be used with vrefresh rates
> - * below 5Hz (10Hz to be on the safe side) without
> - * promoting to 64 integers.
> - */
> - if (10 * (timeval_to_ns(&tnow) - timeval_to_ns(&tvbl)) >
> - 9 * crtc->framedur_ns) {
> - e->event.sequence++;
> - tvbl = ns_to_timeval(timeval_to_ns(&tvbl) +
> - crtc->framedur_ns);
> - }
> -
> e->event.tv_sec = tvbl.tv_sec;
> e->event.tv_usec = tvbl.tv_usec;
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list