[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: WARN if asked to wait on an impossible future seqno
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu Sep 20 10:42:06 CEST 2012
On the hunt for an indefinite __wait_seqno() the most likely cause being
asked to wait upon a future seqno, we can lay a trap and see if anything
gets caught.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 39de523..b2effab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -1118,6 +1118,12 @@ static int __wait_seqno(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, u32 seqno,
bool wait_forever = true;
int ret;
+ if (WARN_ON(!i915_seqno_passed(list_entry(ring->request_list.prev,
+ struct drm_i915_gem_request,
+ list)->seqno,
+ seqno)))
+ return -EDEADLK;
+
if (i915_seqno_passed(ring->get_seqno(ring, true), seqno))
return 0;
--
1.7.10.4
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list