[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Workaround incoherence between fences and LLC across multiple CPUs
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu Apr 4 22:20:50 CEST 2013
In order to fully serialize access to the fenced region and the update
to the fence register we need to take extreme measures on SNB+, and
write the fence from each cpu taking care to serialise memory accesses
on each. The usual mb(), or even a mb() on each CPU is not enough to
ensure that access to the fenced region is coherent across the change in
fence register - however a full blown write-back invalidate (wbinvd) per
processor is sufficient.
Fixes i-g-t/gem_fence_thrash
v2: Bring a bigger gun
v3: Switch the bigger gun for heavier bullets (Arjan van de Ven)
v4: Remove changes for working generations.
v5: Reduce to a per-cpu wbinvd() call prior to updating the fences.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62191
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield at intel.com>
Tested-by: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield at intel.com> (v2)
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index fa4ea1a..632a050 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2689,17 +2689,33 @@ static inline int fence_number(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
return fence - dev_priv->fence_regs;
}
+static void i915_gem_write_fence__ipi(void *data)
+{
+ wbinvd();
+}
+
static void i915_gem_object_update_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
struct drm_i915_fence_reg *fence,
bool enable)
{
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = obj->base.dev->dev_private;
- int reg = fence_number(dev_priv, fence);
-
- i915_gem_write_fence(obj->base.dev, reg, enable ? obj : NULL);
+ struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+ int fence_reg = fence_number(dev_priv, fence);
+
+ /* In order to fully serialize access to the fenced region and
+ * the update to the fence register we need to take extreme
+ * measures on SNB+, and write the fence from each cpu taking
+ * care to serialise memory accesses on each. The usual mb(),
+ * or even a mb() on each CPU is not enough to ensure that access
+ * to the fenced region is coherent across the change in fence
+ * register, but a wbinvd() per processor is sufficient.
+ */
+ if (HAS_LLC(obj->base.dev))
+ on_each_cpu(i915_gem_write_fence__ipi, NULL, 1);
+ i915_gem_write_fence(dev, fence_reg, enable ? obj : NULL);
if (enable) {
- obj->fence_reg = reg;
+ obj->fence_reg = fence_reg;
fence->obj = obj;
list_move_tail(&fence->lru_list, &dev_priv->mm.fence_list);
} else {
--
1.7.10.4
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list