[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] gem_ring_sync_loop.c: fix an operator error

Zhong Li zhong.li at intel.com
Tue Apr 23 09:06:48 CEST 2013


Signed-off-by: Zhong Li <zhong.li at intel.com>
---
 tests/gem_ring_sync_loop.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/gem_ring_sync_loop.c b/tests/gem_ring_sync_loop.c
index 955bf34..cb79e7c 100644
--- a/tests/gem_ring_sync_loop.c
+++ b/tests/gem_ring_sync_loop.c
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ get_num_rings(int fd)
 	gp.param = I915_PARAM_HAS_BSD;
 	ret = drmIoctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GETPARAM, &gp);
 	
-	if ((ret == 0) & (*gp.value > 0))
+	if ((ret == 0) && (*gp.value > 0))
 		num_rings++;
 	else
 		goto skip;
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ get_num_rings(int fd)
 	gp.param = I915_PARAM_HAS_BLT;
 	ret = drmIoctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GETPARAM, &gp);
 
-	if ((ret == 0) & (*gp.value > 0))
+	if ((ret == 0) && (*gp.value > 0))
 		num_rings++;
 	else
 		goto skip;
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ get_num_rings(int fd)
 	gp.param = I915_PARAM_HAS_VEBOX;
 	ret = drmIoctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GETPARAM, &gp);
 
-	if ((ret == 0) & (*gp.value > 0))
+	if ((ret == 0) && (*gp.value > 0))
 		num_rings++;
 	else
 		goto skip;
-- 
1.7.9.5




More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list