[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/17] drm/i915: Don't pass "mem_value" to ilk_compute_fbc_wm

[ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com]

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

The FBC watermark doesn't depend on the latency value, so no point in
passing it in.

Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 61249f2..09e2336 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2245,8 +2245,7 @@ static uint32_t ilk_compute_cur_wm(struct hsw_pipe_wm_parameters *params,
 
 /* Only for WM_LP. */
 static uint32_t ilk_compute_fbc_wm(struct hsw_pipe_wm_parameters *params,
-				   uint32_t pri_val,
-				   uint32_t mem_value)
+				   uint32_t pri_val)
 {
 	if (!params->active)
 		return 0;
@@ -2269,7 +2268,7 @@ static bool hsw_compute_lp_wm(uint32_t mem_value, struct hsw_wm_maximums *max,
 		pri_val[pipe] = ilk_compute_pri_wm(p, mem_value, true);
 		spr_val[pipe] = ilk_compute_spr_wm(p, mem_value);
 		cur_val[pipe] = ilk_compute_cur_wm(p, mem_value);
-		fbc_val[pipe] = ilk_compute_fbc_wm(p, pri_val[pipe], mem_value);
+		fbc_val[pipe] = ilk_compute_fbc_wm(p, pri_val[pipe]);
 	}
 
 	result->pri_val = max3(pri_val[0], pri_val[1], pri_val[2]);
-- 
1.8.1.5