[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Pull watermark level validity check out
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Wed Aug 7 12:24:47 CEST 2013
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Refactor the code a bit to split the watermark level validity check into
a separate function.
Also add hack there that allows us to use it even for LP0 watermarks.
ATM we don't pre-compute/check the LP0 watermarks, so we just have to
clamp them to the maximum and hope things work out.
v2: Add some debug prints when we exceed max WM0
Kill pointless ret = false' assignment.
Include the check for the already disabled 'result' which
got shuffled around when the patchs got reorderd
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index a5a9959..1dd8f30 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2278,6 +2278,49 @@ static uint32_t ilk_compute_fbc_wm(struct hsw_pipe_wm_parameters *params,
params->pri_bytes_per_pixel);
}
+static bool ilk_check_wm(int level,
+ const struct hsw_wm_maximums *max,
+ struct hsw_lp_wm_result *result)
+{
+ bool ret;
+
+ /* already determined to be invalid? */
+ if (!result->enable)
+ return false;
+
+ result->enable = result->pri_val <= max->pri &&
+ result->spr_val <= max->spr &&
+ result->cur_val <= max->cur;
+
+ ret = result->enable;
+
+ /*
+ * HACK until we can pre-compute everything,
+ * and thus fail gracefully if LP0 watermarks
+ * are exceeded...
+ */
+ if (level == 0 && !result->enable) {
+ if (result->pri_val > max->pri)
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Primary WM%d too large %u (max %u)\n",
+ level, result->pri_val, max->pri);
+ if (result->spr_val > max->spr)
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Sprite WM%d too large %u (max %u)\n",
+ level, result->spr_val, max->spr);
+ if (result->cur_val > max->cur)
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Cursor WM%d too large %u (max %u)\n",
+ level, result->cur_val, max->cur);
+
+ result->pri_val = min_t(uint32_t, result->pri_val, max->pri);
+ result->spr_val = min_t(uint32_t, result->spr_val, max->spr);
+ result->cur_val = min_t(uint32_t, result->cur_val, max->cur);
+ result->enable = true;
+ }
+
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("WM%d: %sabled\n", level, result->enable ? "en" : "dis");
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static void ilk_compute_wm_level(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
int level,
struct hsw_pipe_wm_parameters *p,
@@ -2318,13 +2361,7 @@ static bool hsw_compute_lp_wm(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
result->fbc_val = max3(res[0].fbc_val, res[1].fbc_val, res[2].fbc_val);
result->enable = true;
- if (!result->enable)
- return false;
-
- result->enable = result->pri_val <= max->pri &&
- result->spr_val <= max->spr &&
- result->cur_val <= max->cur;
- return result->enable;
+ return ilk_check_wm(level, max, result);
}
static uint32_t hsw_compute_wm_pipe(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
--
1.8.1.5
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list