[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm: use common drm_gem_dmabuf_release in i915/exynos drivers

[Inki Dae]

2013/8/7 Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>

> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 07:18:45PM +0900, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
> > On 08/07/2013 06:55 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Inki Dae <inki.dae at samsung.com> wrote:
> > >>>-----Original Message-----
> > >>>From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch]
> > >>>Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 6:15 PM
> > >>>To: DRI Development
> > >>>Cc: Intel Graphics Development; Daniel Vetter; Inki Dae
> > >>>Subject: [PATCH 1/3] drm: use common drm_gem_dmabuf_release in
> i915/exynos
> > >>>drivers
> > >>>
> > >>>Note that this is slightly tricky since both drivers store their
> > >>>native objects in dma_buf->priv. But both also embed the base
> > >>>drm_gem_object at the first position, so the implicit cast is ok.
> > >>>
> > >>>To use the release helper we need to export it, too.
> > >>Yeah, may I repost this patch with additional work?  We also need to
> export
> > >>with a gem object instead of specific one like you did.
> >
> > I think dmabuf stuff of exynos can be replaced to common drm_gem_dmabuf.
> > Already dmabuf stuff of drm_gem_cma_helper.c was substituted to common
> > drm_gem_dmabuf with low-level hook functions to use prime helpers.
>
> Ah, but that can easily be done on top of this, right?
>

Daniel, could you remove exynos related codes from your patch set?
Your patch set would make exynos broken because you didn't consider
exporting with a gem object for exynos like [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: explicit
store base gem object in dma_buf->priv. So I think your patch set is not
complete set, and That is why exynos needs the additional work I mentioned
above. So I just wanted to repost your patch set + new one.
However, I think not only exynos could go to common drm_gem_dmabuf directly
but also it would make your patch set to be complete set if you remove
exynos related codes from your patch set. Otherwise, we have to work twice.
one is the additional work for resolving exynos broken issue by your patch
set, and other is to replace existing dmabuf stuff of exynos to common
drm_gem_dmabuf.

Thanks,
Inki Dae


> -Daniel
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20130807/ea97b375/attachment.html>