[Intel-gfx] libdrm vs. kernel-drm: Spelling of caching/cacheing and its impact?

[Sedat Dilek]

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:45:47AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> [ Sending to intel-gfx only for 1st feedback ]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> while still digging into my next-20130813 issue, I have searched for
>> some defines:
>
> [snip]
>
>> I also checked intel-gpu-tools which has also cach***e*** pattern in
>> some defines.
>>
>> What's the impact of this misspelling?
>
> Absolutely zero. The only users do not care what the kernel or even
> libdrm call it, only that the value works.

How can the values work if you have different defined macros (defines)?

- Sedat -