[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Boost RPS frequency for CPU stalls
Meng, Mengmeng
mengmeng.meng at intel.com
Thu Aug 29 05:04:13 CEST 2013
Hi,
It's Power results on IVB mobile. With the patches, workloads would cost more power.
mobile IVB
workloads
git-53749d3
git-53749d3 with four patches
Patches VS no Patch
Average watt
Watt-hour
Time
Average watt
Watt-hour
Time
Average watt
Watt-hour
idle
25.6
3.7
9′
25.7
3.8
9′
100.39%
102.70%
video
30.7
2.7
5'30"
30.9
2.7
5'30"
100.65%
100.00%
game
33.5
6.4
11'43"
33.9
6.5
11'41"
101.19%
101.56%
Thanks,
Meng
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Wilson [mailto:chris at chris-wilson.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 6:49 PM
To: Meng, Mengmeng
Cc: Kenneth Graunke; Stéphane Marchesin; Owen Taylor; Zhuang, Lena; Zhang, Ouping; Jesse Barnes; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Boost RPS frequency for CPU stalls
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:12:29AM +0000, Meng, Mengmeng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We test performance of this patch set compared to the current mainline
> without these patches applied.
>
> With patches v.s. the current mainline, most of performance change
> little(<2%) except GL benchmark 2.7.0(↑5%). You may see results attached.
That looks like the range I found locally, and nice that there is no shocking regression. Can you schedule some power testing as well?
Thanks,
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20130829/7a0585a2/attachment.html>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list