[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] drm-intel-collector - update

[Rodrigo Vivi]

This is another drm-intel-collector updated notice:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vivijim/drm-intel/log/?h=drm-intel-collector

Here goes the update list in order for better reviewers assignment:

Patch     drm/i915: Asynchronously perform the set-base for a simple modeset - Reviewed
Patch     drm/i915: Do hw quiescing first during unload - Reviewed
Patch     drm/i915: Downgrade pipe state mismatches to DRM_DEBUG_KMS - Reviewer:
Patch     drm/i915: use __packed instead of __attribute__((packed)) - Reviewer:
Patch     drm/i915: parse backlight modulation frequency from the BIOS VBT - Reviewer:
Patch     drm/i915: i830M has watermarks like i855 - Reviewer:

Overall Process:

drm-intel-collector - review request
 1. Daniel pushs drm-intel-testing (every 2 weeks)
 2. I rebase drm-intel-collector onto drm-intel-testing
 3. Add Reviewer: tag with voluntered reviewers. If you don't believe you should be assigned on a particular patch please don't get mad just tell you wont review or volunteer someone else.
 4. I resubmit remaining patches for review without picking any new (drm-intel-collector - review request)

drm-intel-collector - updated
 5. One week later I collect all simple (1-2) patches that wasn't yet reviewed and not queued by Daniel from one testing update until another.
 6. Request automated QA's PRTS automated i-g-t tests comparing drm-intel-testing x drm-intel-collector
 7. If tests are ok I send the update notification or the patches as a series to intel-gfx mailing list for better tracking and to be reviewed. (drm-intel-collector - updated)
 8. Let me know volunteers for review new patches and also let me know if I've picked any patch that I shouldn't.

There are some reasons that some patches can be left behind:
1. Your patch didn't applied cleanly and I couldn't easily solve the conflicts.
2. Kernel didn't compiled with your patch.
3. I simply missed it. If you believe this is the case please warn me.

Please help me to get these patches reviewed and queued by Daniel.

Also, please let me know if you have further ideas how to improve this process.

Thanks in advance,
Rodrigo.


Adam Jackson (1):
  drm/i915: Downgrade pipe state mismatches to DRM_DEBUG_KMS

Chris Wilson (2):
  drm/i915: Asynchronously perform the set-base for a simple modeset
  drm/i915: Do hw quiescing first during unload

Daniel Vetter (1):
  drm/i915: i830M has watermarks like i855

Jani Nikula (2):
  drm/i915: use __packed instead of __attribute__((packed))
  drm/i915: parse backlight modulation frequency from the BIOS VBT

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c        | 10 +++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h        |  5 +++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c      | 29 +++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.h      | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c   | 13 ++++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c  |  8 ++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c        | 53 ++++++++++------------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo_regs.h | 40 ++++++++++-----------
 8 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.3.1