[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Reorganize the DSI enable/disable sequence

Daniel Vetter daniel at ffwll.ch
Wed Dec 11 14:06:03 CET 2013


On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 05:52:05PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
> Basically ULPS handling during enable/disable has been moved to
> pre_enable and post_disable phases. PLL and panel power disable
> also has been moved to post_disable phase. The ULPS entry/exit
> sequneces as suggested by HW team is as follows -
> 
> During enable time -
> set DEVICE_READY --> Clear DEVICE_READY --> set DEVICE_READY
> 
> And during disable time to flush all FIFOs -
> set ENTER_SLEEP --> EXIT_SLEEP --> ENTER_SLEEP
> 
> Also during disbale sequnece sub-encoder disable is moved to the end
> after port is disabled.
> 
> v2: Based on comments from Ville
>     - Detailed epxlaination in the commit messgae
>     - Moved parameter changes out into another patch
>     - Backlight enabling will be a new patch
> 
> v3: Updated as per Jani's comments
>     - Removed the I915_WRITE_BITS as it is not needed
>     - Moved panel_reset and send_otp_cmds hooks to dsi_pre_enable
>     - Moved disable_panel_power hook to dsi_post_disable
>     - Replace hardcoding with AFE_LATCHOUT
> 
> v4: Make intel_dsi_device_ready and intel_dsi_clear_device_ready static
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yogesh Mohan Marimuthu <yogesh.mohan.marimuthu at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar at intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>

Merged all patches from this series, thanks. btw, when resending
individual patches pls use the --in-reply-to option so that they're all
nicely grouped together with the discussion.

Thanks, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list