[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/15] drm/i915: Don't emit mbox updates without semaphores
Ben Widawsky
benjamin.widawsky at intel.com
Tue Dec 17 05:50:38 CET 2013
Aside from the fact that it leaves confusing dumps on error capture, it
is entirely unnecessary, and potentially harmful in cases like BDW,
where the instruction has changed.
In reality (seemingly), this will have no behavioral impact.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index e05a021..b106984 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -663,14 +663,15 @@ gen6_add_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev;
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
struct intel_ring_buffer *useless;
- int i, ret;
+ int i, ret, num_dwords = 4;
- ret = intel_ring_begin(ring, ((I915_NUM_RINGS-1) *
- MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS) +
- 4);
+ if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev))
+ num_dwords += ((I915_NUM_RINGS-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS);
+#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS
+
+ ret = intel_ring_begin(ring, num_dwords);
if (ret)
return ret;
-#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS
for_each_ring(useless, dev_priv, i) {
u32 mbox_reg = ring->signal_mbox[i];
--
1.8.5.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list