[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/15] drm/i915: Virtualize the ringbuffer signal func
Ben Widawsky
benjamin.widawsky at intel.com
Tue Dec 17 05:50:40 CET 2013
This abstraction again is in preparation for gen8. Gen8 will bring new
semantics for doing this operation.
While here, make the writes of MI_NOOPs explicit for non-existent rings.
This should have been implicit before.
NOTE: This is going to be removed in a few patches.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index cc75205..e638ff1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -632,20 +632,32 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
ring->scratch.obj = NULL;
}
-static void
-update_mboxes(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
- u32 mmio_offset)
+static void gen6_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller)
{
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = signaller->dev->dev_private;
+ struct intel_ring_buffer *useless;
+ int i;
+
/* NB: In order to be able to do semaphore MBOX updates for varying number
* of rings, it's easiest if we round up each individual update to a
* multiple of 2 (since ring updates must always be a multiple of 2)
* even though the actual update only requires 3 dwords.
*/
#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 4
- intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1));
- intel_ring_emit(ring, mmio_offset);
- intel_ring_emit(ring, ring->outstanding_lazy_seqno);
- intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_NOOP);
+ for_each_ring(useless, dev_priv, i) {
+ u32 mbox_reg = signaller->semaphore.signal_mbox[i];
+ if (mbox_reg != GEN6_NOSYNC) {
+ intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1));
+ intel_ring_emit(signaller, mbox_reg);
+ intel_ring_emit(signaller, signaller->outstanding_lazy_seqno);
+ intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
+ } else {
+ intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
+ intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
+ intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
+ intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
+ }
+ }
}
/**
@@ -661,9 +673,7 @@ static int
gen6_add_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
{
struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev;
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
- struct intel_ring_buffer *useless;
- int i, ret, num_dwords = 4;
+ int ret, num_dwords = 4;
if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev))
num_dwords += ((I915_NUM_RINGS-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS);
@@ -673,11 +683,7 @@ gen6_add_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
if (ret)
return ret;
- for_each_ring(useless, dev_priv, i) {
- u32 mbox_reg = ring->semaphore.signal_mbox[i];
- if (mbox_reg != GEN6_NOSYNC)
- update_mboxes(ring, mbox_reg);
- }
+ ring->semaphore.signal(ring);
intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX);
intel_ring_emit(ring, I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX << MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX_SHIFT);
@@ -1866,6 +1872,7 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
ring->get_seqno = gen6_ring_get_seqno;
ring->set_seqno = ring_set_seqno;
ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
+ ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal;
ring->semaphore.mbox[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID;
ring->semaphore.mbox[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RV;
ring->semaphore.mbox[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_RB;
@@ -2042,6 +2049,7 @@ int intel_init_bsd_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer;
}
ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
+ ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal;
ring->semaphore.mbox[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VR;
ring->semaphore.mbox[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID;
ring->semaphore.mbox[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VB;
@@ -2099,6 +2107,7 @@ int intel_init_blt_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer;
}
ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
+ ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal;
ring->semaphore.mbox[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BR;
ring->semaphore.mbox[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_BV;
ring->semaphore.mbox[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_INVALID;
@@ -2140,6 +2149,7 @@ int intel_init_vebox_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
ring->dispatch_execbuffer = gen6_ring_dispatch_execbuffer;
}
ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
+ ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal;
ring->semaphore.mbox[RCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VER;
ring->semaphore.mbox[VCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEV;
ring->semaphore.mbox[BCS] = MI_SEMAPHORE_SYNC_VEB;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
index b5fc768..e01a1ff 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
@@ -121,6 +121,8 @@ struct intel_ring_buffer {
u32 mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS];
/* mboxes this ring signals to */
u32 signal_mbox[I915_NUM_RINGS];
+
+ void (*signal)(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller);
} semaphore;
/**
--
1.8.5.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list