[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: set the backlight panel delays registers to 1

[Paulo Zanoni]

From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>

Because we already do the wait in software: see
ironlake_wait_backlight_on and ironlake_edp_wait_backlight_off.

For the "backlight on" delay, even BSpec says we need to program 0x1
to PP_ON_DELAYS 12:0.

For the "backlight off" delay, if we don't do the same thing, when we
call ironlake_wait_panel_off we'll end up waiting for the it again.

On my machine the off delay is 200ms, so we save this amount of time
whenever we disable the panel (e.g, suspend).

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 13 ++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 69d8f1c..90ff059 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -3535,10 +3535,17 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct drm_device *dev,
 		pp_div_reg = VLV_PIPE_PP_DIVISOR(pipe);
 	}
 
-	/* And finally store the new values in the power sequencer. */
+	/*
+	 * And finally store the new values in the power sequencer. The
+	 * backlight delays are set to 1 because we do manual waits on them. For
+	 * T8, even BSpec recommends doing it. For T9, if we don't do this,
+	 * we'll end up waiting for the backlight off delay twice: once when we
+	 * do the manual sleep, and once when we disable the panel and wait for
+	 * the PP_STATUS bit to become zero.
+	 */
 	pp_on = (seq->t1_t3 << PANEL_POWER_UP_DELAY_SHIFT) |
-		(seq->t8 << PANEL_LIGHT_ON_DELAY_SHIFT);
-	pp_off = (seq->t9 << PANEL_LIGHT_OFF_DELAY_SHIFT) |
+		(1 << PANEL_LIGHT_ON_DELAY_SHIFT);
+	pp_off = (1 << PANEL_LIGHT_OFF_DELAY_SHIFT) |
 		 (seq->t10 << PANEL_POWER_DOWN_DELAY_SHIFT);
 	/* Compute the divisor for the pp clock, simply match the Bspec
 	 * formula. */
-- 
1.8.3.1