[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel_chipset: Merge igt chipsets

[Jesse Barnes]

On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:54:57 -0800
Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> wrote:

> IGT is newer and arguably better. This change doesn't completely merge
> the files because it's a bit simpler if we move the I9XX macro over to
> IGT, and don't move over a few macros from IGT that libdrm doesn't care
> about.
> 
> The advantage is being able to easily synchronize between the two
> definitions.
> 
> It has been discussed, and would seem even easier if IGT simply used the
> libdrm header files, however since we want to keep IGT as isolated as
> possible, and many tests don't rely on libdrm, this isn't a good idea.
> 
> This patch has been sitting around on an internal tree for a while, but
> because Jesse recently pushed VLV ID updates it painfully made me
> realize that I should probably try to upstream it sooner rather than
> later.
> 
> Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net>
> ---

Yeah it's fine with me.  Making merging less painful and spurious
differences fewer is an improvement.

However, consolidating our PCI ID lists would be the best
option.  If we can't use libdrm for that, what should we use?

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center