[Intel-gfx] Including drm-intel tree to linux-next

[Daniel Vetter]

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt at goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 15:19 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:12:02PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > Hi Steven,
>> >
>> > Since about a year ago we've switched drm/i915 to buffer around 2
>> > weeks worth of patches so that we can do decent QA before breaking
>> > everyone's tree when things land in Dave's drm-next. But that also
>> > means we'll miss out a bit in the integration testing -next provides,
>> > which did hurt a bit in recent efforts. Hence can you please include
>> >
>> > git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel drm-intel-next-queued
>> >
>> > into linux-next? Probably best to merge it after drm-next. Note that
>> > drm-intel-next are the QA'ed chunks I send off to Dave. Also, any
>> > mailing lists I'm supposed to follow? And if possible please cc
>> > intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org besides dri-devel/lkml when conflicts
>> > with that tree pop up (you won't get moderation spam any more, we've
>> > fixed that up).
>>
>> I think you want to send this here to Stephen Rothwell. CCed.
>>
>
> This is why I tell people to call me Steve or Steven, but never Stephen,
> otherwise people might confuse me with one of the Stephens that also do
> kernel development.
>
> Note, this is not the first time I've been confused with someone else.
> So don't feel bad ;-)

Oops, indeed picked the wrong mail from my sea of "drm/i915 broke
stuff, again" mails ;-) Sorry for the noise, Steve.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch