[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/66] drm/i915: Getter/setter for object attributes

Daniel Vetter daniel at ffwll.ch
Mon Jul 1 21:08:58 CEST 2013


On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
>> All of this is addressed in future patches. As we've discussed, I think
>> I'll have to respin it anyway, so I'll name it as such upfront. To me it
>> felt a little weird to start calling things "ggtt" before I made the
>> separation.
>
> I think now that we know what the end result should (more or less at
> least) look like we can aim to make it right the first time we touch a
> piece of code. That will reduce the churn in the patch series and so
> make the beast easier to review.
>
> Imo foreshadowing (to keep consistent with the "a patch series should
> tell a story" analogy) is perfectly fine, and in many cases helps in
> understanding the big picture of a large pile of patches.

I've forgotten to add one thing: If you switch these again later on
(layz me didn't check for that) it's imo best to stick with those
names (presuming they fit, since the gtt_size vs. obj->size
disdinction is a rather important one). Again I think now that we know
where to go to it's best to get there with as few intermediate steps
as possible.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list