[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/35] drm/i915: Replace the ILK/SNB/IVB/HSW watermark code
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Fri Jul 5 11:37:08 CEST 2013
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 11:57:42AM +0300, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> There is a major problem with the watermark registers; they're not
> double buffered. So we need to make sure we update them at the correct
> time when messing about with planes. The correct time is the beginning
> of vblank.
>
> So when we determine that the watermarks need to updated hand in hand
> with the next vblank, we store the pre-computed watermarks under
> intel_crtc, and when the vblank happens, we promote the pending
> watermarks to active status.
>
> on HSW when the watermarks for any pipe change, we must merge the
> watermarks from all pipes so that we can determine the correct LP1+
> watermark levels. For simplicity we follow the same codepaths for
> pre-HSW hardware as well, but there all the LP1+ watermarks will be
> disabled when multiple pipes are enabled. Once the watermarks are
> merged we check them for validity, disabling any invalid levels.
>
> Touching the watermark registers causes the hardware to re-evaluate the
> watermarks, which expeds some power. So after merging the watermarks
> we check which watermark registers actually need to be changed. And
> finally we write the watermarks registers in the correct order.
Yet you do not justify doing so from interrupt context. A simple way
would be to set safe WM (min of current vs next) before the config
change, then schedule an update outside of interrupt context after the
vblank.
I really want an explanation for why doing so in interrupt context is
the only sane way. Real power numbers vs complexity please.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list