[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip pixel multiplier x-check if we fail to send the command
Damien Lespiau
damien.lespiau at intel.com
Thu Jul 11 22:35:17 CEST 2013
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 09:52:33PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 07:46:00PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> > If intel_sdvo_get_value() fails here, val is unitialized and the cross
> > check won't check anything.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
> > index b8e1623..4481f6a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
> > @@ -1357,7 +1357,10 @@ static void intel_sdvo_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > }
> >
> > /* Cross check the port pixel multiplier with the sdvo encoder state. */
> > - intel_sdvo_get_value(intel_sdvo, SDVO_CMD_GET_CLOCK_RATE_MULT, &val, 1);
> > + if (!intel_sdvo_get_value(intel_sdvo, SDVO_CMD_GET_CLOCK_RATE_MULT,
> > + &val, 1))
> > + return;
>
> But now it fails silently instead of being paranoid ... Can we just shut
> up the tool instead?
We absolutely can! (and it's done).
--
Damien
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list