[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: fix reference counting in i915_gem_create
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Wed Jul 24 16:36:40 CEST 2013
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 03:48:28PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 02:02:20PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> This function is called without the dev->struct_mutex held, hence we
> >> need to use the _unlocked unreference variants.
> >>
> >> As soon as the object is registered userspace can sneak in here with a
> >> gem_close ioctl call, so the object can (and with my new evil tests
> >> actually does) get the final unreference in this place. The lack of
> >> locking then results in hilarity and some good leakage.
> >>
> >> v2: We need to make the trace call _before_ we drop our ref - the
> >> object might very well be gone by then already.
> >
> > Pass the size into the tracepoint, that gets rid of the racy read (the
> > actual userspace side we've allowed ourselves to be racy before). And
> > keeps the function clean, if you rewrite it like I suggested.
>
> Well I honestly don't really see the upshot of the little diff you've
> pasted on irc. The bug is that we call the wrong unreference function
> and that we access the object after we've dropped the reference.
Ignoring the typo, it is much neater code. The code that was there
before my hack.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list