[Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 [ call-trace: drm | drm-intel related? ]

[Sedat Dilek]

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:37:44PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Jani Nikula
>> <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Jani Nikula
>> >>> <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> >>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr at canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> >>>>>> Hi all,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Changes since 20130724:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Removed tree:
>> >>>>>>         arm-dt (at maintainer's request)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> The wireless-next tree lost its build failure and gained a conflict
>> >>>>>> against Linus' tree.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> The tty tree lost its build failure.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> The staging tree gained a build failure for which I disabled a driver.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> [ CCing drm and drm-intel folks ]
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> With today's next-20130725 I see the following:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Use of dev_priv->gt_lock in I915_WRITE through
>> >>>> intel_disable_gt_powersave before spin lock init, caused by
>> >>>>
>> >>>> commit 181d1b9e31c668259d3798c521672afb8edd355c
>> >>>> Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
>> >>>> Date:   Sun Jul 21 13:16:24 2013 +0200
>> >>>>
>> >>>>     drm/i915: fix up gt init sequence fallout
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Ah, cool.
>> >>>
>> >>> I assumed/tested "drm/i915: fix the racy object accounting", but this
>> >>> does not fix it.
>> >>> Will try with yours.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Sorry, Jani.
>> >>
>> >> next-20130725 ships the patch you pointed, too.
>> >
>> > Confused. I meant that the above mentioned commit "drm/i915: fix up gt
>> > init sequence fallout" causes the problem. The patch I included in my
>> > mail should fix it. Could you try that please?
>> >
>>
>> [ Note2myself: Do not read half of the message... ]
>>
>> The bad... Your patch needed some refresh against next-20130725 (guess
>> it's against drm-intel-nightly).
>>
>> The good... YES, your patch fixes the issue for me!
>>
>> The ugly... /me.
>>
>> Feel free to add my:
>>
>>        Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com>
>>
>> Thanks for the quick fix!
>
> Thanks a lot for the report, since this should be something I should have
> caught. And for added insult the offending patch is already in Linus' tree
> :( Patch merged to -fixes.

Hmmm, don't you merge -fixes into -nightly?

- Sedat -

> -Daniel
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch