[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Unpin stolen pages

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Sat Jun 1 13:34:05 CEST 2013


On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 11:17:10AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > That neatly explains the WARN. Not too happy about accumulating lots of
> > backing storage specific processing into free_object, but that can be
> > fixed up later (there is an obj->ops->release() pending).
> 
> I'm more irked with the semantic overloading of object pinning. Might
> be cleaner to otherwise mark stolen obejcts as not shrinkable instead
> of pinning them for their entire lifetime. But we can bikeshed that
> later on ;-)

Some merit to that argument, but it still feels correct to say that the
stolen pages are pinned for their lifetime. Given obj->ops->release(),
it does actually become simpler to not mess around with pin_count. So
later it is.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list