[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Reorder ring reinitialisation round reset

Ben Widawsky ben at bwidawsk.net
Thu Jun 13 01:57:37 CEST 2013


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:42:56PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 02:15:48PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 01:54:50PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > In particular, we were reseting our GEM tracking before even attempting
> > > (and failing) to reset the chip. Do it with the other bookkeeping after
> > > successfully reseting. Note that we can simplify the reset to always do
> > > the GPU reinitialisation as for UMS it will simply be redundant in the
> > > case where X was switched away. And that we can safely re-establish all
> > > the features that were setup during initialisation - any that were not
> > > enabled for UMS/DRI1 will not be restored and should still not be enabled.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > >
> > 
> > FWIW: I have some patches in my PPGTT series which I think accomplish the same
> > thing with a nicer end result.
> 
> But the alliteration! If you already have something better, please
> ignore these.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Chris
If only it didn't cause me rebase conflicts, I'd be totally on board!
Let me double check that I don't completely fix the problem.

In general I have some use cases which could benefit from using the ring
during reset which I don't have a clear vision on how to fix. For now I
am bending over backwards to not use the ring.

-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list