[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Fix a couple of "should it be static?" sparse warnings

[Damien Lespiau]

A genuine 'static' omission and 2 other warnings triggered by not
including the header where those functions where defined.

Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index cc9440b..154d0a4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
 #include "intel_drv.h"
 #include "../../../platform/x86/intel_ips.h"
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <drm/i915_powerwell.h>
 
 #define FORCEWAKE_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS 2
 
@@ -2465,8 +2466,8 @@ static void hsw_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
 
 /* Find the result with the highest level enabled. Check for enable_fbc_wm in
  * case both are at the same level. Prefer r1 in case they're the same. */
-struct hsw_wm_values *hsw_find_best_result(struct hsw_wm_values *r1,
-					   struct hsw_wm_values *r2)
+static struct hsw_wm_values *hsw_find_best_result(struct hsw_wm_values *r1,
+						  struct hsw_wm_values *r2)
 {
 	int i, val_r1 = 0, val_r2 = 0;
 
-- 
1.8.1.4